Jakub Pavlik wrote: > it took us 2 years of hard working to get these official. OpenStack-Salt > is now used by around 40 production deployments and it is focused very > on operation and popularity is growing. You are removing the project > week after one of top contributor announced that they will use that as > part of solution. We made a mistakes, however I do not think that is > reason to remove us. I do no think that quality of the project is > measured like this. Our PTL got ill and did not do properly his job for > last 3 weeks, but this can happen anybody. > > It is up to you. If you think that we are useless for community, then > remove us and we will have to continue outside of this community. > However growing successful use cases will not be under official > openstack community, which makes my feeling bad.
Note that being in the Big tent as an official project (vs. just being under te openstack/* namespace as an unofficial ecosystem project) is not a judgment of value (or usefulness) on the project. It is a judgment in community alignment. Are you a project produced by the OpenStack Community ? Are you aligned with the OpenStack mission, do you follow our principles and processes ? Missing the Ptl election is a sign of non-alignment with the rest of the OpenStack community. So is missing the numerous emails I sent over the last months to ask about Design Summit space. The question now is, are those signs enough to justify removal the "official" stamp from the team or not. I tend to lean towards leniency, but I'm just one vote. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev