Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2017-01-12 22:38:46 -0800: > Kevin Benton wrote: > > If you don't want users to specify network details, then use the get me > > a network extension or just have them boot to a public (or other > > pre-created) network. > > > > In your thought experiment, why is your iPhone app developer not just > > using a PaaS that handles instance scaling, load balancing and HA? Why > > would he/she want to spend time managing security updates and log > > rotation for an operating system running inside another program > > pretending to be hardware? Different levels of abstraction solve > > different use cases. > > Fair point, probably mr/mrs iPhone app developer should be doing that. >
I totally disagree. If PaaS was the answer, they'd all be using PaaS. Maybe some day, but that's no excuse for having an overly complex story for the base. I totally appreciate that "Get me a network" is an effort to address this. But after reading docs on it, I actually have no idea how it works or how to make use of it (I do have a decent understanding of how to setup a default subnetpool as an operator). __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev