Good update, thanks fungi. Just a thought, given the pain we felt yesterday when static.o.o was down, we should consider if a log solution needs to be a priority. Using afs (or swift) could allow us to scale static.o.o horizontally.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2016-06-08 23:08:16 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> > wrote: > > [...] > > > Store Build Logs in Swift > > [...] > > > We should remove the original spec from our priority list (since > > > that's basically already ceased to be an actual priority), and > > > probably supercede it with the AFS proposal. > [...] > > Additionally the urgency of this spec seems to have been reduced (due to > > limiting the retention on logs). We should perhaps reconsider if it's a > > priority spec or not after we've decided on a path forward. > > That makes sense, though I think we can agree the original spec (and > accompanying implementation) has ceased to be treated as a priority > so it's a bit disingenuous to leave it on our priority list. > > Anyway, I've pushed a cleanup/update change at > https://review.openstack.org/331903 which: > > * removes logs-in-swift > * replaces maniphest with task-tracker > * adds nodepool-zookeeper-workers due to its coupling with zuulv3 > * updates the Gerrit query string/URL accordingly > > I'll put it on the meeting agenda now for formal council vote this > week. If approved, this leaves us at 6 priority specs, so if we > consider that we were pretty well saturated at 8 last cycle, we can > also discuss adding a couple more we expect to be spending > significant time on over the remainder of this cycle or whether > sticking with those 6 is perhaps better for focusing our efforts? > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2016-06-08 23:08:16 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> > wrote: > > [...] > > > Store Build Logs in Swift > > [...] > > > We should remove the original spec from our priority list (since > > > that's basically already ceased to be an actual priority), and > > > probably supercede it with the AFS proposal. > [...] > > Additionally the urgency of this spec seems to have been reduced (due to > > limiting the retention on logs). We should perhaps reconsider if it's a > > priority spec or not after we've decided on a path forward. > > That makes sense, though I think we can agree the original spec (and > accompanying implementation) has ceased to be treated as a priority > so it's a bit disingenuous to leave it on our priority list. > > Anyway, I've pushed a cleanup/update change at > https://review.openstack.org/331903 which: > > * removes logs-in-swift > * replaces maniphest with task-tracker > * adds nodepool-zookeeper-workers due to its coupling with zuulv3 > * updates the Gerrit query string/URL accordingly > > I'll put it on the meeting agenda now for formal council vote this > week. If approved, this leaves us at 6 priority specs, so if we > consider that we were pretty well saturated at 8 last cycle, we can > also discuss adding a couple more we expect to be spending > significant time on over the remainder of this cycle or whether > sticking with those 6 is perhaps better for focusing our efforts? > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra