On 2017-05-25 00:33:10 +0000 (+0000), Tristan Cacqueray wrote: > On May 24, 2017 11:04 pm, James E. Blair wrote: > [...] > >How does that sound? > > Thinking about further connections support, could this also works > for a (theorical) mail based patch cross dependency?
I can imagine wanting something like: Depends-On: https://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2017/5/24/668/1 ...where zuul will git am what it finds there. > What's the logic to match the Depends-On syntax to a connection > driver? This brings up an additional question: how far can we stretch the concept of a connection driver, and does it always need to be something we can report back on in some way? Maybe we want to test a Gerrit change or GutHub PR which requires a patch from the LKML (as above) when rebuilding the kernel for a guest, but we don't ever expect to report back to the LKML about anything. Would having a generic HTTP(S) driver for things like this make sense? -- Jeremy Stanley _______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra