On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 4:55 AM, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote:
> On 2017-05-29 13:34:47 +1000 (+1000), Joshua Hesketh wrote: > [...] > > We could extend the 'start message' of zuul to explain what it is > > about to do. eg: "Testing change XYZ against $branch, with change > > XYZ applied to $project $branch, with..." etc. > > This would be hard (I think for definitions of hard roughly equal to > impossible) for dependent pipelines since the non-declared > dependencies which will be tested in the pile can't be guessed in > advance (some may be kicked out, some may come between declared > dependencies, et cetera). > Right you are. Unless the start message is reposted each time the dependencies are recalculated this isn't the best place. > > > This could alternatively go into a "state" file (of sorts) in the > > zuul logs/output. ie, summarise what the zuul-cloner did into > > simple terms that doesn't involve large logs. > > I'm assuming you mean zuul-merger unless zuul-cloner is growing to > replace zuul-merger in v3 or something? Anyway, I agree a general > logset per changeish might be nice in addition to per-job logs and > this information might fit well somewhere there (or copied into each > build result). > Right, merger or cloner (since the cloner gets what the merger prepped). Cheers, Josh > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-Infra mailing list > OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-Infra mailing list OpenStack-Infra@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-infra