Hello everyone, We already got good feedback on my sandbox test review. So I would like to move forward.
With review [1] we will get a stackforge repo called „telcowg-usecases“. Submitting a usecase will then follow the process of OpenStack development (see [2]). The is one thing currently open: Anita suggested to rename our IRC channel from #openstack-nfv to #openstack-telcowg which seems logical to me. If we agree to this I will register the channel and we can move forward. I won’t be able to participate in our meeting today, but feel free to discuss this topic there and let me know. Regards Marc [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155248/ [2]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/How_To_Contribute Am 06.02.2015 um 12:11 schrieb Marc Koderer <m...@koderer.com>: > Hello everyone, > > we are currently facing the issue that we don’t know how to proceed with > our telco WG use cases. There are many of them already defined but the > reviews via Etherpad doesn’t seem to work. > > I suggest to do a review on them with the usual OpenStack tooling. > Therefore I uploaded one of them (Session Border Controller) to the > Gerrit system into the sandbox repo: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152940/1 > > I would really like to see how many review we can get on it. > If this works out my idea is the following: > > - we create a project under Stackforge called telcowg-usecases > - we link blueprint related to this use case > - we build a core team and approve/prioritize them > > Regards > Marc > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators