First let me just say that I find nothing more infuriating than “software licensing.” We burn so much effort on this, when all we want to do is share the code to help others. </soapbox>
I agree with Joe, I thought the agreement was stuff in “contrib” wouldn’t need license, specific formatting, test, etc. So I feel like a blanket notice in the README is sufficient there. We should keep the bar to this very low (simple lint checking only, IMO.) Then do get into the “curated” repos, you have to have a proper license, formatting, etc. Since the Apache 2 doc says “SHOULD”, I would argue we don’t make a license required for contrib, but recommend that people do put it in there as best practice. But we shouldn’t hold up reviews and not merge stuff into contrib just because of a lack of license. As an end user who just wants to put my stuff out there, it’s this kind of crap that makes me abandon the effort and not try again. (Here is another good example: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247725/ ) Mike On 11/19/15, 9:40 PM, "Tom Fifield" <t...@openstack.org> wrote: >On 20/11/15 12:29, Matt Fischer wrote: >> Is there a reason why we can't license the entire repo with Apache2 and >> if you want to contribute you agree to that? Otherwise it might become a >> bit of a nightmare. Or maybe at least do "Apache2 unless otherwise stated"? > >According to http://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#new > >"Each original source document (code and documentation, but excluding >the LICENSE and NOTICE files) SHOULD include a short license header at >the top." > > >> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Joe Topjian <j...@topjian.net >> <mailto:j...@topjian.net>> wrote: >> >> Thanks, JJ! >> >> It looks like David Wahlstrom submitted a script and there's a >> question about license. >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247823/ >> >> Though contributions to contrib do not have to follow a certain >> coding style, can be very lax on error handling, etc, should they at >> least mention a license? Thoughts? >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:38 PM, JJ Asghar <j...@chef.io >> <mailto:j...@chef.io>> wrote: >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> >> Hey everyone, >> >> I just want to announce that tools-contrib[1] is now open for >> submissions. Please take a moment to read the README[2] to get >> yourself familiar with it. I'm hoping to see many scripts and tools >> start to trickle in. >> >> Remember, by committing to this repository, even a simple bash >> script >> you wrote, you're helping out your future Operators. This is for >> your >> future you, and our community, so treat em nice ;)! >> >> [1]: https://github.com/openstack/osops-tools-contrib >> [2]: >> >> https://github.com/openstack/osops-tools-contrib/blob/master/README.rst >> >> - -- >> Best Regards, >> JJ Asghar >> c: 512.619.0722 <tel:512.619.0722> t: @jjasghar irc: j^2 >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 >> Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org >> >> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWTO+/AAoJEDZbxzMH0+jTRxQQAK2DJdCTnihR7YJhJAXgbdIn >> NZizqkK4lEhnfdis0XZJekofAib7NytuAtTuWUQOTLQaFv02UAnMqSyX5ofX42PZ >> mGaLtZ452k+EhdeJprO5254fka8VSaRvFOZUJg0K0QjZrj5qFwtG0T1yqVBBCQmI >> wdUkxBB/cL8M0Ve6LaQNS4vmx03ZC81FLEtVX2O62EV8FrP8sxuXc7XDTCRbLnhR >> rb2HJC7R9/AZtr2gjwr7id714QFEEAgCKca79l+vsaE3VRfy+KbHsKqY9vPrxPVn >> qqXLQOm8ZDgXedjxYraCDBbay/FQqVrsEt/0RiAKrtAIRbLm2ZkiR/XL6J3BtNzi >> 2sNt12m/VkrMv9zWUT/8oqiBb73eg3TbUipVeKmh4TD12KK16EYMSF+mH9T7DY2Z >> eP2AT6XEs+BDohP+I3L7WM5r/AKl9r40ulLEqRR7y+jcn5qwAOEb+UzUpna4wTt/ >> mZD5UNNemoN5h2P4eMPpfnZnpNcy4Qe/qoohZdAov4Gvdm3tmbG9jIzUKF3Q9Av5 >> Uqpe6gUcp3Qd2EaKYGR47B2f+QRLlTs9Sk5lLBJSyOxpA53KcK9125fS0YM6VMVQ >> wETlxAggnmt4diwSoJt8VSYrqXlieo7eHkjv/s4hSGIcYBqtkCPZnNPliJmvMmfh >> s/wsl6ICrB7oe55ghDbM >> =EWDz >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> <mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> <mailto:OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> > > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-operators mailing list >OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
