I am confused! Are we asking for short license notice at the top of the contributions as Tom mentioned or just this global one?
No preference at this moment but we should do things right from the beginning. Edgar On 11/20/15, 9:13 AM, "JJ Asghar" <[email protected]> wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA512 > >On 11/19/15 10:40 PM, Joe Topjian wrote: >> Unless there's a reason why we *can't* do something like that (I have no >> idea why, but I never assume anything when it comes to things like >> licensing :) then I'm in favor of updating the README to state "Your >> code will be licensed under Apache 2 unless you mention otherwise." >> > >I love this idea. I saw the review come in, we should get that merged ASAP. > >- -- >Best Regards, >JJ Asghar >c: 512.619.0722 t: @jjasghar irc: j^2 >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 >Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org > >iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWT1S6AAoJEDZbxzMH0+jTS+EQAL6wXiOKFxERaSXynQo8q3qT >8lVSBpzuIDZVwbxEEZSVj7z8OswkRIOMH+lSEl0mqU+6oUBOxPzNbCulV//fkJpp >Yi9T/V1PfJnP0ItiLG2Qw6koQNFWHJYCce2uG+4qsNSx09InuEyhxWwkxzc9QVVH >2I1hEFF6Jcc0P3fXOWDmRAMG9ZnZaiwQe/ANgc2dzaI5FSmYHj5SBGXQGZBKHccq >f9RtHfkYpWhyBc+Os1D71FFe8pF87zsBPQ14IyskH4edJNiL9ka+8hWD7anVjANe >5cjVy7n9Mj3p2yKc3evWyW+9Zv8dDYM5x2Mczh7OhhpxRtyHFDXEZTOYrqP21+8H >PFWsCeXLJtS2MVLd+UL4Jhl1svGqHn1TutknSosIuoVqFhEnGvn4ThG3p+fAzbsf >WuZXJifjFDsOM9wML28ld5Mi5MsDEbP8a3/1kaV2ZOFKhhzWxo1+/ZraiHi84iWP >+TsGH1w+pou69G+I8dtDk9ohJcBWbdjTpvc8coSeWvL18LgenuimL59ghwtnLIWc >TndLXoabgnElMLBITF9g9wo3MT40EWtVVg2MNluXT4GSBhwjKEAzWvX3A3ow6jLH >TW+E/FvRDSyiN8N0ozOrzPr0ceccC1bxbXVHw2kPQnRZaFw/72XCvEfuyFprE9iU >Mg4waAzOIe4bbsLUHtGS >=K+jB >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-operators mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators _______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
