So +1

Tim

From: Lance Bragstad <lbrags...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<openstack-...@lists.openstack.org>
Date: Wednesday, 12 September 2018 at 20:43
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<openstack-...@lists.openstack.org>, OpenStack Operators 
<openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] Consistent policy names

The topic of having consistent policy names has popped up a few times this 
week. Ultimately, if we are to move forward with this, we'll need a convention. 
To help with that a little bit I started an etherpad [0] that includes links to 
policy references, basic conventions *within* that service, and some examples 
of each. I got through quite a few projects this morning, but there are still a 
couple left.

The idea is to look at what we do today and see what conventions we can come up 
with to move towards, which should also help us determine how much each 
convention is going to impact services (e.g. picking a convention that will 
cause 70% of services to rename policies).

Please have a look and we can discuss conventions in this thread. If we come to 
agreement, I'll start working on some documentation in oslo.policy so that it's 
somewhat official because starting to renaming policies.

[0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/consistent-policy-names
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators

Reply via email to