2011/7/12 John Dickinson <john.dickin...@rackspace.com>: > On Jul 12, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: >> So, you'd have bug *reporting* in one place and bug *tracking* in >> another? And you'd have roadmaps displayed in one place, but roadmap >> *planning* in another? That sounds like a terrible idea to me. > This doesn't mean different "places", ie toolsets. Different "roles". > Openstack should be focused on doing what is possible to encourage getting > these projects into production: large-scale QA, defining the "Openstack > vision", and visibility to the community for roadmaps, bugs, and advocacy. > The big-picture things rather than toolset-level choices.
I still have no clue what this means. Can you elaborate? -- Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/ Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/ OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
