On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Soren Hansen <so...@linux2go.dk> wrote: > 2011/7/12 John Dickinson <john.dickin...@rackspace.com>: >> On Jul 12, 2011, at 12:45 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: >>> So, you'd have bug *reporting* in one place and bug *tracking* in >>> another? And you'd have roadmaps displayed in one place, but roadmap >>> *planning* in another? That sounds like a terrible idea to me. >> This doesn't mean different "places", ie toolsets. Different "roles". >> Openstack should be focused on doing what is possible to encourage getting >> these projects into production: large-scale QA, defining the "Openstack >> vision", and visibility to the community for roadmaps, bugs, and advocacy. >> The big-picture things rather than toolset-level choices. > > I still have no clue what this means. Can you elaborate?
I'll give it a shot. John, correct me if I'm off base. This helps me understand the other point of view... I think what John is making the distinction between is that reporting bugs and displaying a roadmap for OpenStack, the set of related projects, should be in one place, and the focus of people working on "OpenStack" (as opposed to the individual projects themselves) should be focusing only on large-scale QA, while the individual projects should be free to use whatever tools work best for them and not be too concerned about what the OpenStack project (the whole thing) uses or needs. -jay _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
