The context is the rather long thread that occurred on the mailing list. I would say there's been quite a bit of discussion there already. I would like for us to at least talk about it in concept today even if we don't approve it wholesale in it's current format. I think the main concepts do align with quite a few of the mailing list posts.
Jonathan. On Aug 30, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Joshua McKenty wrote: > This proposal is missing sufficient context to even be considered, as well as > being basically contrary to the original goals of the OpenStack project. I > would suggest punting it back to the broader community for a thorough > discussion before we bring it to the PPB. > > Joshua McKenty > Piston Cloud Computing, Inc. > w: (650) 24-CLOUD > m: (650) 283-6846 > jos...@pistoncloud.com > > On 2011-08-30, at 12:14 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote: > >> We have one item on the agenda for today (APIs). Jorge has put together a >> proposal in the wiki based on the discussions over the past week or so. >> >> http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Proposed/APIManagement >> >> Jonathan. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc >> Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
