On 09/13/2012 12:42 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Brian Waldon and I discussed this today. We came up with an idea which is to have the 
tempest run on stable/<last-release> during the dev cycle, and after the last 
milestone turn it on during the bugfixing phase. The potential disadvantage of this 
approach is that it could potentially make bugfixes a little harder to get in, but it 
might help make things more stable.

Definitely worth a discussion at the summit.

I think that would be a great idea. I'm still not convinced we need to fully give up on tempest running fully on normal commits. Post Folsom release / pre summit, I'm going to take some time to dive into the problem. The nose auto parallelizing isn't currently working, but some manual approaches might.

        -Sean

--
Sean Dague
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: sda...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
alt-email: slda...@us.ibm.com


--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-qa-team
Post to     : openstack-qa-team@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-qa-team
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to