Brian, your two posts seem at odds with each other.

So, I've got this completely external view and possibly my own particular skew 
on the vision for OpenStack... specifically, I want it to isolate me from 
provider as much as possible.  Either I'm going to use AWS compatible 
interfaces for a provider or OpenStack and one has to win in the long run... 
okay, maybe not, maybe two co-exist as presentation layers for an internal 
cloud engine that's extensible middleware or some similar model.

Regardless, I want OpenStack API to run anywhere for any provider so I can 
choose from a marketplace of providers and have more than one PROVIDER for 
HA/DR reasons.  I also use the right tool for the job but when it comes to 
entire classes of APIs I'm going to make a business choice and... well, I'll 
tell ya... I'm not going to write for each provider if I can avoid it... I'm 
going to pick one.  I want that one to end up being OpenStack with a fan-out to 
whatever provider fills in the back-end (common design pattern here).

I use the right tool for the right job as well, like you mentioned in your 
prior post; however, I pick and make investments in platform APIs which is what 
OpenStack, IMNSHO, aspires to be.

I'm curious whether the product managers/owners involved think the focus should 
be on AWS API compatibility or whether it should be about OpenStack 
functionality compatibly executed on the AWS platform.  In my opinion OpenStack 
shouldn't be trying to be Euca and a Euca/AWS-compatible presentation layer to 
OpenStack is interesting but not terribly strategic.  The market is still 
emergent and the enterprise is the big win so... I'd let tool-switchers switch 
to a new, better, OS API set rather than trying to backfill a presentation 
layer for existing SMB market on AWS.

I'd think the Highlander approach: "There can be only one", in terms of API 
set, is what we'd be striving for.  

Not that I, like, have an opinion or anything.  ;)


Jan Drake


From: brian.sch...@nimbisservices.com
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:53:45 -0400
To: devin.car...@gmail.com
CC: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Cross-zone instance identifiers in EC2 API - Is it     
worth the effort?



Devin, agree with you 100% that the EC2 and OS APIs are presentation/view 
layer. I also think that there is way too much view/control and policy 
dependencies buried down in the core nova-* services.  The core services like 
nova-compute shouldn't be using things like EC2 instance-id, instance-type, 
flavor, etc.  they should be dealing with a more abstract pool of resources 
hosts, instances, networks, etc.  



-------------------------------------------------Brian Schott, CTONimbis 
Services, Inc.brian.schott@nimbisservices.comph: 443-274-6064  fx: 443-274-6060

On Jul 9, 2011, at 8:19 PM, Devin Carlen wrote:Yes - and this is a perfect 
example of why it's important for people to think of the EC2 and OpenStack 
API's not as mid-layer APIs in some stack. These APIs are actually presentation 
layers.  Currently there is far too much core logic happening in the EC2 API 
for sure.  At this tier, there shouldn't be anything other than data 
transforming and API specific muck going on.

Nova is currently missing a classic middle tier, and this is why it gets 
difficult to circle back and add support for security groups to the OpenStack 
API.  There's no common layer that both APIs rely on.

This way you end up with a middle tier that is a super set of both OpenStack 
and EC2 APIs, and then exposing functionality in one API or the other is truly 
just a presentation issue, because by forcing the core to be implemented in a 
common layer, you force the person(s) implementing the feature to deal with the 
bigger picture, and not favor one API over the other.


_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to     : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp                               
          
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to     : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to