On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Tomasz Paszkowski <ss7...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Doug Hellmann > <doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com> wrote: > > > > Nice! > > > > For production code I think we are going to want to separate collection > from > > storage, aren't we? We don't want each compute node to require access to > the > > database server (that's an issue with nova that they are trying to fix > > during the folsom release, IIRC). > > Yes. Part of the code responsible for amqp support is not functional yet :( > OK, that's what I thought. We all seem to be reinventing different parts of the services that we will eventually need, which is good for education but may be wasting a bit of energy. Is it premature to start talking a little more about architecture so we can start splitting up the implementation work and focusing that energy differently? There is a lot of work we can do independently of the remaining decisions outlined in http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda. > > > > -- > Tomasz Paszkowski > SS7, Asterisk, SAN, Datacenter, Cloud Computing > +48500166299 > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
