On 05/09/2012 11:11 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Tomasz Paszkowski <ss7...@gmail.com > <mailto:ss7...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Doug Hellmann > <doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com <mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com>> wrote: > > > > Nice! > > > > For production code I think we are going to want to separate collection > from > > storage, aren't we? We don't want each compute node to require access > to the > > database server (that's an issue with nova that they are trying to fix > > during the folsom release, IIRC). > > Yes. Part of the code responsible for amqp support is not functional yet > :( > > > OK, that's what I thought. > > We all seem to be reinventing different parts of the services that we will > eventually need, which is good for education but may be wasting a bit of > energy. Is it premature to start talking a little more about architecture so > we can start splitting up the implementation work and focusing that energy > differently? There is a lot of work we can do independently of the remaining > decisions outlined in http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda. Hi,
It looks like the architecture of metering is indeed always implemented in similar ways. I had discussions with a company yesterday about their own metering implementation (which will be used in production soon) and it also has an architecture matching what has been proposed so far in ceilometer. I added a few points to the architecture chapter in the wiki: http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering#Architecture including a note summarizing the conclusions of the discussion regarding need for an independent ceilometer agent in addition to the existing meters provided by the OpenStack components. What do you think ? > > > > > > -- > Tomasz Paszkowski > SS7, Asterisk, SAN, Datacenter, Cloud Computing > +48500166299 <tel:%2B48500166299> > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack> > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > <mailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > <https://launchpad.net/%7Eopenstack> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack > Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Loïc Dachary Chief Research Officer // eNovance labs http://labs.enovance.com // ? l...@enovance.com ? +33 1 49 70 99 82
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
