Ok, if I was giving out t-shirts for finding this issue then the prize would go to Pete. Thank you!!!!
Disabling fallocate did the trick. I was slowly working my way through all the object-server config options and hadn't gotten to that one yet. Turning features on and off by brute force is admittedly lame, but sometimes that's all you have. I also turned off all the other things I was doing to try to slow down the mini-servers, but disabling fallocate was all that was necessary. Here is my config: [DEFAULT] bind_ip = 192.168.1.202 workers = 1 disable_fallocate = true [pipeline:main] pipeline = object-server [app:object-server] use = egg:swift#object [object-replicator] [object-updater] [object-auditor] A few more details... My servers are running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. A straight-up apt-get of all the pre-requisites did NOT produce a working Swift deployment on Arm. Although all the dependencies would deploy fine and the Swift services would start up, the proxy-server could not communicate with the storage nodes. So I also had to get older, Armel versions of the python-greenlet and python-eventlet. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/armel/python-greenlet/0.3.1-1ubuntu5.1 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/armel/python-eventlet/0.9.16-1ubuntu4.1 Once I deployed those older libraries for Armel, then my Swift cluster worked (except for the fallocate issue). Thanks for everyone's help. -N On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Nathan Trueblood <nat...@truebloodllc.com>wrote: > The filesystem is XFS, and I used the recommended mkfs and mount options > for Swift. > > The file size seems to have no bearing on the issue, although I haven't > tried really tiny files. Bigfile3 is only 200K. > > I'll try disabling fallocate... > > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Pete Zaitcev <zait...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:16:52 -0700 >> Nathan Trueblood <nat...@truebloodllc.com> wrote: >> >> > Definitely NOT a problem with the filesystem, but something is causing >> the >> > object-server to think there is a problem with the filesystem. >> >> If you are willing to go all-out, you can probably catch the >> error with strace, if it works on ARM. Failing that, find all places >> where 507 is generated and see if any exceptions are caught, by >> modifying the source, I'm afraid to say. >> >> > I suspect a bug in one of the underlying libraries. >> >> That's a possibility. Or, it could be a kernel bug. You are using XFS, >> right? If it were something other than XFS or ext4, I would suspect >> ARM blowing over the 2GB barrier somewhere, since your object is >> called "bigfile3". As it is, you have little option than to divide >> the layers until you identify the one that's broken. >> >> BTW, make sure to disable the fallocate, since we're at it. >> >> -- Pete >> > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp