> -----Original Message----- > From: shengjie_...@dell.com [mailto:shengjie_...@dell.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:38 AM > To: Jiang, Yunhong > Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net > Subject: RE: [Openstack] [Ceilometer] Ganglia Ceilometer integration > > >If Ganglia has interest in ceilometer data, we can achieve it through a > >specific > publisher, to put data into Gangalia. > > @yunhong, So it is more like the approach to CW or Synaps, isn't it? if the > monitoring system is interested in the meters from Ceilometer, we can have > different publishers to push data to different destinations(I think this can > be a
Also, if some data from other monitor system like Gangalia is meaningful for openstack, they can be pushed to ceilometer also, either through special pollster to talk to those monitor system, or through REST API. > potential blueprint for be stored in a centralized storage just with > different namespaces). But that being said, if the backend is something > like Cassandra, Mongo or even Hbase, the system metrics(from gmond) and > openstack specific meters might be stored in a centralized storage just with > different namespaces. Thoughts? Considering we have a generalized storage abstraction, I fully agree that adding HBase is helpful. As to " be stored in a centralized storage just with different namespaces", isn't it be a deployment story? Thanks --jyh > - Shengjie _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
