no, that's not my question. I'm already overcommiting, but now need to prioritize one instance above others in terms of perfomance.
________________________________ От: Eugene Nikanorov <enikano...@mirantis.com> Отправлено: 12 января 2017 г. 1:13:27 Кому: Ivan Derbenev; openstack@lists.openstack.org Тема: Re: [Openstack] Openstack+KVM+overcommit, VM priority Ivan, see if it provides an answer: https://ask.openstack.org/en/question/55307/overcommitting-value-in-novaconf/ Regards, Eugene. On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:55 PM, James Downs <e...@egon.cc<mailto:e...@egon.cc>> wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:34:32PM +0000, Ivan Derbenev wrote: > if both vms start using all 64gb memory, both of them start using swap Don't overcommit RAM. > So, the question is - is it possible to prioritize 1st vm above 2nd? so the > second one will fail before the 1st, to leave maximum possible perfomance to > the most importan one? Do you mean CPU prioritization? There are facilities to allow one VM or another to have CPU priority, but what, if a high priority VM wants RAM, you want to OOM the other? That doesn't exist, AFAIK. Cheers, -j _______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack@lists.openstack.org> Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Post to : openstack@lists.openstack.org Unsubscribe : http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
