On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 05:51:03PM +0200, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Works perfectly for me and my configuration is even more complicated: > - GRUB on hda > - /boot on hdb5 > - / on LVM on hdb > - mount-by-label for all filesystems > - I can move hdb around as I want (hdc, hdd etc.) and only have to > change one line in GRUB, no aother changes necessary.
Is there a reason that /boot is on a seperate partition? I do not know LVM, so I can only guess that the reason is that LVM is not directly bootable. As we had a LONG discussion where it was decided to have /home on a seperate discussion, this would lead to the following solution if we should decide to go with LVM 1 reiser partition /boot to make it bootable 1 LVM partition / 1 LVM partition /home To explain: the seperate /home is not so much about size as it is about keeping your data and settings with a new installation. If there is no real reason to have a seperate /boot, then it would still make sence to have a seperate / and /home as we have now. -- houghi http://houghi.org http://www.plainfaqs.org/linux/ http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html > > Today I went outside. My pupils have never been tinier... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
