jdd wrote: > Rajko M a écrit : > >> Some editor has to be included and nano fits better because it's no >> learning necessary type of editor, as mentioned in few other posts. > > we need mostly know the _size_ of nano and it's dependencies, more than > the ease of use. > > I'm used on many linux variants (from mulinux and gentoo to suse) and > the only thing I _always_ find is Vi on it's mini flavor (there is NO > "original" Vi as I discovered once, but many flavors, Vim being the more > common, but not the smaller). so any usual linux user (the one than can > have to wotk on various machines) must have at least some sort of use ov > Vi.
You're right that almost any Linux user has to have Vi installed in
their system but it still doesn't mean that they
- even know they have it installed
- known how to work with it
- like it
- are satisfied with working with it
Back in 90's I was used to have 'pico' and 'pine' in my system but the
time has changed ;)
Well, we could have both hard-core vi + some easy-to-operate editor for
novices :)
Lukas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
