On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > How does this look? Are we fine to go for 10.2 and 10.3 with these? > Goals > ===== > * Clear naming > * Smaller repositories for faster metadata download > * Use structure for 10.3 again > Separate trees > ============== > * OSS (factory) > * NON-OSS (factory-extra) > * Debug (factory-debug) > * Sources for OSS > * Sources for NON-OSS > > Naming > ====== > * let's use "repository" instead of catalog, inst-source etc. > > FTP Structure > ============= > Below .../opensuse/distribution/ we will have a "10.2" with the > following subdirectories: > * iso > * repo > > The "iso" subdirectory has the following subdirectories: > * delta - delta ISO images > * dvd - DVD5 iso images > * cd - CD iso images, contains Base CDs and Add-ons (including Non-OSS > Addon) > * torrent (all torrent files) > > The "repo" subdirectory has the following subdirectories: > * debug - repository with just debuginfo packages > * non-oss - repository with only Non-OSS packages > * oss - repository with only OSS packages > * src-non-oss - source RPMs for the non-oss tree > * src-oss - source RPMs for the oss tree > > Factory Distribution > ==================== > The factory tree should be separated in a similar way: > > Below .../opensuse/distribution/ we will have a "factory-repo" with > the following subdirectories: > > * debug - repository with just debuginfo packages > * non-oss - repository with only Non-OSS packages > * oss - repository with only OSS packages > * src-non-oss - source RPMs for the non-oss tree > * src-oss - source RPMs for the oss tree
I really like it. I only wish we could shorten distribution to dist. Thanks, -- Boyd Gerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZENEZ 1042 East Fort Union #135, Midvale Utah 84047 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
