Klaus Kaempf wrote: > * Andreas Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Jan 22. 2007 15:50]: >> Jim Pye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Andreas >>> >>> I see that openssh is there, good. Having that gives the ability to do a >>> lot of things remotely if networking is included (Which looks as if it >>> is as dhcpcd is there) >>> >>> However one thing I see missing, it could however be in things like >>> coreutils, is an editor. Not wanting to start a flame war but vi, emacs, >>> pico, nano etc. >> That's why I decided to leave this out. I do expect that those >> experts that use the minimal base system will add their own choice. > > We could define the functionality "text editor" as a requirement, fulfilled > by any of the mentioned packages. So you can't have a minimal system without > an editor but you're still free to choose your own.
Think about the consequences - for years we have assured all and sundry that the one thing in life that you can depend on is that any unix install will include vi. To suddenly yank that rug of security out from under an unsuspecting world would be outrageous. Joe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
