Gerd Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
>> Woudln't it be better to give some choice? E.g. "Use kernel parameter
>> ... (not recommended), use lvm" Are there any other fundamental choices?
>
> IMO lvm is the only sane approach to handle that many filesystems.
>
> Beside that, there is still kpartx (part of multipath-tools) which is
> able to create device mapper mappings for DOS partitions.  I'm not sure
> though whenever it can handle more esoteric partition formats such as
> bsd slices.

But setting kpartx up automatically is a challenge.

Guys, do you really see this a limitation that will hit many of us?

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.suse.de/~aj/
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
   Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgpDjKj8b83jn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to