On Wednesday 07 March 2007 20:50:52 you wrote: > Alberto Passalacqua wrote: > > Il giorno dom, 04/03/2007 alle 13.18 +0000, Francis Giannaros ha > > > > scritto: > >> Just a note that I don't necessarily think that the Bug triage day(s) > >> should happen just yet -- I think the ideal time is just a couple or so > >> months before release, where changes can still be made, but there's > >> feature freeze etc. That would be the most productive time for it, I > >> believe. > > > > Yes! I agree on this. Doing them now is premature in my opinion because > > too many changes and features still have to be introduced. > > > > Regards, > > Alberto > > I disagree with this, > > I think that a bug review should be scheduled as soon as reasonable. > While your statements about it being too early are true for the bugs > listed against the 10.3 release, the bugs listed against the older > releases should really be addressed as quickly as possible so that they > stand a chance of making it into the 10.3 at all. > > If you wait too long on this, they will skip yet another release cycle. > > I think that the early alpha time frame is ideal to review bugs against > the older releases otherwise fixing them might introduce too much churn > to be included after a feature freeze. > > Thoughts?
The point of course is to not way *too* long, so that changes can still be put into effect, but not too early, before the features and new packages are in. If that happens, then we'll start fixing/cleaning up places of bugs, but then a whole horde of other ones might be created before release. A couple of months before release time sounds good to me. Kind thoughts, -- Francis Giannaros Website: http://francis.giannaros.org IRC: apokryphos on irc.freenode.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
