>>> On 20-04-2007 at 16:06, Martin Schlander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder, do kde-backports and kde-playground have same vendor? If
not this 
> behaviour would also make it possible to have kde-playground enabled
for 
> certain packages, without constantly having to be alert as to whether
you're 

I think the whole thing is going in the right direction now: have
upgrades happen only withing the same vendor. This would allow me to add
packman again as a source (hmm. just wonder: do I need it? anyhow I can
just copy thge required RPMs down).

But this gives a new 'problem' for the BS repos: as far as I know,
they're all by the same vendor. Maybe the repo name should be added
there, so that 'inter-repo-updates' (so from one repo to another' don't
happen.

Example: 
I have GNOME:UNSTABLE in my source list.
out of GNOME:UNSTABLE I link some to my home repo, with some patches.

Both are in my source list.
I most likely will want to keep the packages from where I installed
them until further configuration.

A notice, that another subscribed repo provides a newer version could
thus be interesting... but that's another story.

Dominique

--








































TMF is a global management and accounting outsourcing firm with 72
offices in 56 countries and over 2,000 professionals (February 2007).
TMF is expanding rapidly throughout the world. Learn more about our
unique network and our services and visit our website at
www.tmf-group.com.

The information contained in this e-mail communication is confidential
and solely intended for the person to whom it is addressed. If someone
other than the intended recipient should receive or come into possession
of this e-mail communication, he/she will not be entitled to read,
disseminate, disclose or duplicate it. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are requested to notify the sender and to destroy the
original e-mail communication. 
TMF is neither liable for the correct and complete transmission of the
information contained in this e-mail communication nor for any delay in
its receipt.  This footnote also confirms that this email message has
been checked for the presence of computer viruses.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to