Jochen Hayek wrote:
> I have a few disks with fstab entries like this one:
> 
>     
> noauto,nocheck,acl,user_xattr,loop=/dev/loop0,encryption=twofish256,phash=sha512,itercountk=100
> 
> I would like to mount them under 10.3Alpha3 resp. SUSE Factory.
> 
> cryptsetup's manual page says 
> 
>     COMPATABILITY WITH OLD SUSE TWOFISH PARTITIONS 
> 
>            To read images created with SuSE Linux 9.2's loop_fish2 
> 
>            use --cipher twofish-cbc-null -s 256 -h sha512,
> 
>            for images created with even older SuSE Linux
> 
>            use --cipher twofish-cbc-null -s 192 -h ripemd160:20
> 
> but if twofish-cbc-null is not listed in /proc/crypto ,
> there is no way getting this working, right?

That's not the problem. The fstab line means you use losetup to set
up an encrypted loop device. When migrating util-linux to
util-linux-ng the loop-AES patch got dropped. The itercountk option
was part of that patch. As quick workaround to be able to access
your data you can install util-linux (or just mount/losetup) from
10.2. The plan is to not reintroduce the loop-AES patch (yast never
offered to use any of it's options right?) and also to get rid of
the loop_fish2 kernel module for 10.3 though.

> Shall I just forget twofish256 and migrate all my encrypted disks?

If that's an option four you it certainly makes sense to use a more
secure on-disk format. 10.3 should still be able to read old images
though. Therefore cryptsetup/dm-crypt do suppport the loop_fish2
format (twofish-cbc-null) in factory already. What's missing atm is
the ability to generate keys compatible with the loop-AES patch.
Please file a bug and assign it to me, I'll consider implementing
replacements for itercountk and pseed options in cryptsetup.

cu
Ludwig

-- 
 (o_   Ludwig Nussel
 //\   SUSE Labs
 V_/_  http://www.suse.de/
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to