>The only difference to the normal rpm's is that ours are compiled
>mtune=i686. And honestly right now I am even thinking the difference is
>not that great to justify such a step. We probably should roll only
>rpm's where we actually do genuinely make a difference, the xorg rpm for
>instance or any other where we modify something (like prelink). I have
>seen most increases there without having to roll out dozens of other
>rpm's.

>And then there are already x86_64 compiled rpm's in existence .... the
>ones we would compile would virtually not make nay difference. We just
>introduce a probability of incompatibility/bugs.

It's ok for me. I have searched around for optimiziation flag for x86_64,
and I havn't find mutch. 


>> 2. test and install it on beta4
>> 3. build cd image

>That is really the only step really required.
I begin do try to make it toaday with beta3. I will be able to dowload beta4
in 2, 3 days, torrent isn't so fast! 

>> 4. benchmark
>> 

>And that one ;)

Of course.

>Anyhow .. what are your thoughts?

>From http://www.opensuse.org/index.php/SUPER 

Currently integrated enhancements

    * Prelinking
    * preload kde+OpenOffice
    * Con Kolivas kernel patches
    * Some i686 packages
    * Fonts Optimal Use of Fonts on SuSE 

I read correctly in b4 are integreted preload and  Fonts. So i have in any
case to make rpm for prelinking and kernel.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to