>>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2005 at 8:29 pm, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> The only difference to the normal rpm's is that ours are compiled >>mtune=i686. And honestly right now I am even thinking the difference is >>not that great to justify such a step. We probably should roll only >>rpm's where we actually do genuinely make a difference, the xorg rpm for >>instance or any other where we modify something (like prelink). I have >>seen most increases there without having to roll out dozens of other >>rpm's. > >>And then there are already x86_64 compiled rpm's in existence .... the >>ones we would compile would virtually not make nay difference. We just >>introduce a probability of incompatibility/bugs. > > It's ok for me. I have searched around for optimiziation flag for x86_64, > and I havn't find mutch. > > >>> 2. test and install it on beta4 >>> 3. build cd image > >>That is really the only step really required. > I begin do try to make it toaday with beta3. I will be able to dowload beta4 > in 2, 3 days, torrent isn't so fast! >
I will be looking at doing an x86_64 single CD install today to help you along. >>> 4. benchmark >>> > >>And that one ;) > > Of course. > >>Anyhow .. what are your thoughts? > > From http://www.opensuse.org/index.php/SUPER > > Currently integrated enhancements > > * Prelinking > * preload kde+OpenOffice > * Con Kolivas kernel patches > * Some i686 packages > * Fonts Optimal Use of Fonts on SuSE > > I read correctly in b4 are integreted preload and Fonts. So i have in any > case to make rpm for prelinking and kernel. > > Well they are not really integrated as such. I should probably change the wording. We have tested them and done some benches. Once the SUPER 1 CD install is done we can possibly call it integrated. Andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
