2005/10/4, Andreas Girardet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0"
> ! SUPER Version !! 3d FPS !! app1 !! app2 !! app3 !! boot1 !! boot2 !!
> harddisc1 !! harddisc2
>
>
> 10.0 03.102005 - [[SLICK]] (with [[SUPER preloading]] and binary
> drivers) || 1944.400 || 4 || 3 || 23 || 33 || 8 || 118 MB in 3.02 =
> 39.01 MB/sec || 2384 MB in 2.00 = 1191.93 MB/sec
>
>
> compared to
>
>
> 10.0 final (preloading is now standard) 312 5 3
> 25 26 14 118 MB in 3.02 = 39.12 MB/sec 2336 MB in 2.00
> = 1167.93 MB/sec
>
> Speed increase minimal (apart from 3d and slower first boot) but
> overall the SLICK system just feels more responsive. Am I right with
> this assumption? Can anyone provide feedback as I am certainly slightly
> subjective ...
>
> Andreas
Based on my experience with previous release (just downloaded the
latest and preparing to install it), SLICK feels more responsive than
other I have tried.
-Jukka
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
