Am 12.01.2011 10:35, schrieb Egbert Eich: > Matthias Hopf writes: > > On Jan 11, 11 19:02:30 +0100, Krzysztof elechowski wrote: > > > > the predefined font in my c.lsp is: "*lucidatypewriter-medium-r*-12-*" > > > > xlsfonts "*lucidatypewriter-medium-r*-12-*" > > > The same at my side, and C language files display neatly as required. > The problem is with HTML. > > > > xedit is using a seriously broken font setup for HTML, that is true. The > > "code" font is much too small (still readable in my place, so you have > > an additional issue). > > > > Please report this upstream, we don't do anything special about xedit > > (heck, I guess it's the first time I ever actually run it knowingly). > > > > Point is, the patches that went into xedit over the past year were mostly > build fixes. Paolo used to maintain it (he also was the author of the lisp > interpreter) but he hasn't contributed anything for two years now. So xedit > is an x app that is more or less shipped as is. > My fear is that if people raise too much hell upstream about it being broken > it will become a more likely drop candidate. > There are numerous much more powerful and better maintained editors around > and and it may not be considered the HTML editor of choice by the vast > majority of web developers. > I certainly don't think the issue you are seeing has not been introduced > recently as there have been no patches going in regarding fonts for quite > a while. > I suggest you use a different editor for html unless you would like to > investigate and fix the issue yourself. I'm sure fixes are welcome upstream. >
I do not think that it is a matter of code. the lisp files use many different fonts. It should be manageable to select a common font and make the stuff readable. Fixing a broken default config is a no-op. The missing documentation is also an issue but unrelated. re, wh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
