Eberhard Moenkeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > With a list server attached "Reply-To", _NOT_ANY_ handcrafting would be > necessary _ANYWHERE_.
I'd have to set the broken-reply-to flag for Gnus--otherwise pressing (r)eply would do the wrong thing. > Please tell me a practical reason... I do not see anything else than > a chance for posters to use "split addresses", i.e. to direct list > answers away from the list. Still enough mails, more than enough mails! will find their way onto the list ;) I like it to receive messages twice if somebody answers my mailinglist contributions--one message will go into the ML folder and the other one into my default folder. If you don't like it, just set reply-to to opensuse@opensuse.org for this list. That's possible, but if the ML pretends to own the reply-to field, participants cannot make use of this field. Not setting reply-to is just a good thing to secure your personal data; setting reply-to is just too dangerous for users new to MLs. Join a ML such as Internet in Bibliotheken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and you will quickly see what the problem with setting reply-to. -- Karl Eichwalder R&D / Documentation SUSE Linux Products GmbH Key fingerprint = B2A3 AF2F CFC8 40B1 67EA 475A 5903 A21B 06EB 882E --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
