On 2006-12-20 16:21, Charles philip Chan wrote: > On 20 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> So it does seem to be a definite kernel bug. weird. >> > > They don't work with kernel 2.6.19 either. > > Charles > > Incorrect. Felix Miata has compiled one which works, with a lot of stuff stripped out:
> On 2006/12/20 09:01 (GMT+-0500) Nick Zentena apparently typed: > > >> > On Wednesday 20 December 2006 09:02, Felix Miata wrote: >> > > >>> >> Have you read the bug? Etch's and Fedora's 2.6.18 kernels also fail. >>> >> OTOH, the vanilla 2.6.19 kernel worked for me yesterday, and still works >>> >> today. >>> > > >> > How did you configure it? I downloaded it and did an make oldconfig. It >> > still >> > fails here. >> > > I didn't build it specifically for testing this problem, instead for > cifs & smbfs testing. I stripped out a lot of useless hardware support > to conserve space. http://mrmazda.no-ip.com/tmp/config Maybe we can talk Felix into adding stuff back in, until it breaks -- then we will have found the culprit :-) -- The best way to accelerate a computer running Windows is at 9.81 m/s² -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
