On Sunday 24 December 2006 19:48, Randall R Schulz wrote: > On Sunday 24 December 2006 19:46, J Sloan wrote: > > Randall R Schulz wrote: > > > Can you define what you mean when you say: > > > > > > - "enough of a critical mass" > > > - "to matter" > > > - "leverage control" > > > - "onramps to the information highway" > > > - "game over" > > > - "meaningful access" > > > - "most internet content" > > > - "islands" > > > - "hopeless, irrelevant rebellion" > > > - "microsoft world" > > > > Sorry, but if you're going to play dumb, it would be far too tedious > > and time consuming to try and bring you up to speed. Suffice it to > > say there is apparently a huge gap between our positions. Go back to > > sleep... > > Then I take it you cannot neither explicate nor defend your position, > whatever it may be, using concrete, unambiguous and non-metaphorical > language. > > > I accept your concession.
Why must you be so rude! -- _____________________________________ John Andersen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
