-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The Saturday 2007-01-20 at 11:26 +0100, Theo v. Werkhoven wrote:

> > > Well, my instructors in the early '70's told me that a byte was
> > > analogous to "bite" -- not the smallest "bit" accessible, but smaller
> > > than the full-size "word" of most architectures of the time.  And some
> > > architectures do allow you direct access to a bit.
> 
> Why only some?
> Aren't shift- and logical operations part of all CPU architectures?

That's not direct access to a bit, IMO. Direct access would be an 
operation that would load into a register a certain bit, or another that 
would compare directly to a certain bit in a byte in memory (in one op). I 
have never seen it, though.

- -- 
Cheers,
       Carlos E. R.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76

iD8DBQFFsg4CtTMYHG2NR9URAnP/AJ4luD5x+PTuNRQbsKRiRZj9amMCLQCffWcw
fIliJPC8kJbk2nzq25yqbDM=
=yOBT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to