On Saturday 24 February 2007 16:07, John Andersen wrote: > ecause ogg is merely an encapsulation mechanism, implementers still > have to support a multitude of codecs in order to be able to decode what > might be hidden inside. Including mp3 formats.
> You should get in the habit of being a little more precise in what you > wish for, Such as Ogg/Vorbis or Ogg/Speex. C'mon, what is meant is obvious. Who in the world would suggest Ogg/mp3 as a way to avoid patents??? Out of 100 people referring to "ogg," how many meant ogg as a container for mp3???? Ordinarily my answer would be zero. Today, I guess the answer is one, apparently: you. Oh well, I am confident the other 99 understood the point of the discussion perfectly. Bryan -- *************************************** Powered by Kubuntu Linux 6.06 KDE 3.5.2 KMail 1.9.1 This is a Microsoft-free computer Bryan S. Tyson [EMAIL PROTECTED] *************************************** -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
