do you mean that in your case it's better to get new installation than upgrade method?
if i look the development from 10.2 to 10.3 alpha i didn't see significant ... may be only kernel(if any) .. so the upgrade is better for me than took longer time to download n install it form beginning ==> give me the clues if im wrong about this cheers, tambun > For those people out there testing the next version of open suse 10,3 - > could some great degree of testing involve testing the Product in a > upgrade situation rather than a New installation. > After I upgraded 10,1 to 10,2 RC I came across more bugs to the extent > that the upgrade ability could only be rated as beta. I begin reporting > upgrade bugs, however due to the enormity and frequent comment by > suse.de (Then you should not buy new software). I was not prepared to > waste more of my time. > I always buy boxed software and my only plea for Alpha 10,3 that a great > deal of testing is done via an upgrade (not clean) installation > I have been testing software (given most of my earlier life's experience > was with large Main Frame installations), and latter PC operating systems. > The upgrade path for all New software application development is always > the most difficult to achieve. > As an active tester of RC software I need to gain some personal > confidence that upgrade-ability has been tested by a few more dedicated > other > > Kind Regards and > Good Morning 06:30 GMT+10 > Scott > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
