On Tuesday 08 May 2007, Mike McMullin wrote: > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 14:35 -0700, Robert Smits wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 May 2007 13:41, Mike McMullin wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 11:49 -0800, John Andersen wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 08 May 2007, Marcus Meissner wrote: > > > > > > Much posturing, but Balmer is still > > > > > > claiming Linux violates MS IP > > > > > > > > > > Any cites for this statement? Its just FUD. > > > > > > > > If I need to cite that for you, you must have been stationed > > > > on Mars for the last year. > > > > > > Cite it anyway, the onus is now on you, this being a fairly asked > > > question. > > > > Fairly asked question? This is either a mistake, in that John suggested > > the FUD part of the question to refer to the validity of Ballmer's > > claims, or a troll, and I suspect the former. The Linux mailing lists > > have been all over Monkey-Boy Steve Ballmer's comments. Here's just one > > quote, from > > Marcus Meissner is an Engineer at SuSE, that makes me think he's not > being a troll. >
We know who Marcuse is. That's why we are surprised that his CEO knows Ballmer is still claiming linux violates MS IP, but Marcus seems to pretend this is not happening. Others seem to think that just because Ballmer has not said anything in the last week that he has forgotten the issue. That would be a foolish mistake. As soon as he has redhat and suse signed onto his agreement all the small players will find themselves in court. -- _____________________________________ John Andersen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
