-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 S Glasoe wrote: > On Monday May 14 2007 10:08:29 pm frank nelson wrote: >> Only fair. It would be a bit hypocritical to demand a standard >> for others, that one does not demand of oneself. > > Ah that'd be Microsoft Marketing 101 just down the hall second door > on the right.
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1729908,00.asp Quote from article: "But Ravicher said Ballmer misinterpreted his study's findings. "He misconstrues the point of the OSRM study, which found that Linux potentially, not definitely, infringes 283 untested patents, while not infringing a single court-validated patent." "The point of the study was actually to eliminate the FUD about Linux's alleged legal problems by attaching a quantifiable measure versus the speculation," he said. "And the number we found, to anyone familiar with this issue, is so average as to be boring; almost any piece of software potentially infringes at least that many patents."" /J - -- There's nothing a concentrated phaser blast can't solve. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGSa+8Jvr6GUkh0/0RApuGAJoDqunJ5i9kdLxk00hAEYJv0KV4FgCg4nCk +1ulmNF/CvUbVcgUf2U+YfY= =KVV1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
