On 27/08/07, John Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 26 August 2007, Benji Weber wrote: > > On 26/08/07, Thomas Hertweck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > No, I expect it to be the same when performing an update (as we did) - > > > if an update causes problems like that, something has gone wrong and the > > > distributor did a bad job. An update is not allowed to change any > > > critical system settings. The situation is different when you perform an > > > upgrade, i.e. you install a complete new version of a distribution... > > > > It's not a critical system setting, it may change just on a reboot, if > > you change nothing... > > Not Critical? > Who says its not? > > The bitching about this name change has been loud and long all over the > net for every distro that did not add a feature to nail it down.
There is a feature for static names, just the ethX names are not the static ones. I fail to see what your point is, If you want persistent names use the persistent names, if you want non-persistent names use the ethX. _ Benjamin Weber -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
