On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 11:48 -0400, Kenneth Schneider wrote: > On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 17:12 +0200, primm wrote: > > On Saturday 20 October 2007 16:54:19 Josef Assad wrote: > > > Kevin Dupuy wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 13:09 -0500, Scott Jones wrote: > > > >> On Wednesday 17 October 2007, primm wrote: > > > > > > > > I want to know who at SUSE/Novell let that splash screen leave with that > > > > ugly gray around it! > > > > > > gimp's splash is visually consistent with the OO.o splash. I think it's > > > positive to note that - even if you don't like the logo - the strive for > > > visual consistency is A Good Thing(tm). > > > > > > > I totally disagree. Make a splash that appeals to women. The gimp need to > > show > > what it's at, not what it's for. Men love consistency I know. Women thrive > > on > > variety. They make your life more interesting. > > > > When was the last time _you_ invited anyone to dinner and asked them if > > they > > preferred red or white? > > > > Actually you need to have a splash screen that looks very professional > so the CEO at Bigcorp, Corp. will get the impression that the product is > very professional. I'm not saying that OO is not professional it is the > CEO that needs to be impressed so they will use it in their company. >
If the CEO is a woman, then Lynn's argument stands. If the CEO is a man, then the splash needs to appeal to the CEO's wife. In which case, Lynn's argument still stands. :-) -- ---Bryen--- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
