-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 * ianseeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [10-24-07 16:36]: > On Wednesday 24 Oct 2007, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > > > Anyway, my answer was intended as a "pun". > > ? Its caused a load of totally unnecessary rants because of a false > assumption.
No, your failure to properly and completely present your case generated the responses and my post was the first suggesting that the observed action by kmail was *correct*, as it was for here. When you ask a question and fail to distinguish the parameters, you take the answers you get. If you don't like it, ask proper questions! ps, you could at least trim the sigs from your quotes. Your expected consideration will be appreciated. - -- Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://counter.li.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn4472 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHH7BIClSjbQz1U5oRAkc0AJ4olVwkABV69TBhL5OQJqdtKqfPDwCfQmHh f/swPW6KBnM/zogIRG3X9Mk= =L5o3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
