Anders Johansson wrote:
On Saturday 05 January 2008 23:32:39 Aaron Kulkis wrote:
Strange how all of them were also part of the "Bush stole
the election" pack of idiots, too (despite the fact that
EVERY SINGLE RECOUNT -- Including the unofficial one done
by left-wing newspaper and magazine staffers...all had
counts favoring Bush).
Well, that's not entirely true
http://www.aei.org/docLib/20040526_KeatingPaper.pdf
but enough of this. Let's get back on topic
The paper doesn't say that Bush stole the election.
It says that for various technical problems, that when
an automatic balot counter tabulates votes, each ballot
has around 2% chance of not being counted.
It also says that a lot of people who voted were
too stupid to figure out how to make a mark or
punch a hole in their ballot (and in such cases,
their votes DESERVE to be ignored. Really, if
you can't figure out how to punch ONE AND ONLY
ONE hole for a position...then you have no
business being in a voting booth. Any candidate
whose victory depends on incompetent voters
doesn't deserve to hold office.)
And the argument that Democratic-run counties were the
most likely to use such machines is hardly evidence
of a conspiracy by Bush and the Republican party.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
