Here here (hear hear?)

Although - I might say that I think 'lack of doco' is probably more to blame
than power use features. :)

-mike

On 4/11/02 4:20 PM, "Maurice C. Parker" ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
penned the words:

> On Sunday, November 3, 2002, at 09:28 PM, Francisco Hernandez wrote:
> 
>> I found this in my bookmarks today, maybe you can use some of it or
>> contact
>> its author and collaborate?
>> http://enigmastation.com/~joeo/webwork.html
> 
> I'd never seen this doc before.  I just wanted to comment on a sentence
> in the "Editorial" section.
> 
> <quote>
> Their mentality is why this document needed to be written: their
> attitude is that "if we build it, the people who want to use it can put
> in the time to learn how to use it," ...
> </quote>
> 
> Joseph's assumption that we think people need to invest time in
> learning WebWork is the exact opposite of true.  One of the founding
> principals of the project is that WebWork is supposed to be easy to
> use.  You shouldn't have to spend a lot of time either reading the
> source code or reading boring documentation.  The project is supposed
> easy for the beginner to use and flexible enough for complicated
> applications.
> 
> The fact that new users don't understand that this project is about
> ease of use and simplicity is indicative of where we have gone wrong
> recently.  I think we have gotten off track and need to get back on.
> For example, this is the reason you sometimes hear me tell people "no"
> to new features.  Anything that clutters up the framework, is something
> that new users have to learn about.  Take a look at the
> webwork.properties file, and you will see where we could have done
> better.  There are so many configuration options that I wouldn't expect
> an OpenSymphony developer to understand it all.  Cleaning that thing up
> is what I want for 2.0.  Not more damned poweruser features.
> 
> Let's try to focus on usability.  Low defects, easy to use, and simple
> to understand.  In the future I would like people to get a better
> impression of us than Joseph got.
> 
> -Maurice
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
> Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
> fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in
Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to