Why don't you write documentation in xdoc format? This is basically XHTML,
augmented with 3-4 special tags. Then you can use Maven to generate HTML,
PDF, RTF, whatever.

Aslak

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Simon Stewart
> Sent: 10. desember 2002 19:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Documentation
>
>
> On Tuesday, Dec 10, 2002, at 16:32 Europe/London, Ken Egervari
> [eXtremePHP] wrote:
> >
> > XSLT will also help us out if the website presentation layer changes
> > or when
> > we decide to compile the manual into a PDF document (which I really
> > hope we
> > do since PDF is a fantastic format for printing and offline viewing).
> > XML
> > will critical to achieve this.
>
> Maybe I'm just a little bit confused, but won't both the XML and the
> HTML crowd be happy with XHTML? Seems like a Really Obvious Solution.
> Fine, you can't use the Docbook tools that come with lots of linux
> distros, but that's just a minor implementation detail --- I bet that
> there are loads of people champing at the bit for a tool to convert
> their websites to PDF :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to