Why don't you write documentation in xdoc format? This is basically XHTML, augmented with 3-4 special tags. Then you can use Maven to generate HTML, PDF, RTF, whatever.
Aslak > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Simon Stewart > Sent: 10. desember 2002 19:00 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [OS-webwork] Documentation > > > On Tuesday, Dec 10, 2002, at 16:32 Europe/London, Ken Egervari > [eXtremePHP] wrote: > > > > XSLT will also help us out if the website presentation layer changes > > or when > > we decide to compile the manual into a PDF document (which I really > > hope we > > do since PDF is a fantastic format for printing and offline viewing). > > XML > > will critical to achieve this. > > Maybe I'm just a little bit confused, but won't both the XML and the > HTML crowd be happy with XHTML? Seems like a Really Obvious Solution. > Fine, you can't use the Docbook tools that come with lots of linux > distros, but that's just a minor implementation detail --- I bet that > there are loads of people champing at the bit for a tool to convert > their websites to PDF :) > > Regards, > > Simon > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork