On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 11:31 AM, Patrick Lightbody wrote:
If we don't include ant but instead tell people to download ant, I canI disagree. Think of the maintenance hassle. Do you want to check in new versions of ant into 10 projects? And the reason maven isn't used is frankly because it's a foolish tool that is generally used by the need for coolness factor. While I don't doubt that it's useful for some, the general impression I get is that it's more of a fun 'look at all the cruft we get for free' cookiecutter tool.
promise you that the mavenites will be clamoring for maven builds instead,
since downloading maven or downloading ant are parallels. Besides, build.xml
is there, you can use ant just like you always have.
I don't agree with a comparison of ant and maven. ant is an established stable tool used by many many projects, it's a standard almost. maven is....not
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
