What kind of real world example applications do you want? Wafer has a working webwork example...
And docs? Who needs them - they're for people who aren't willing to roll their sleeves up and dig directly into the code, right? (Note droll humour.) On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Heng Sin Low wrote: > I think it might be beneficial to do both xwork and webwork as separate project > at this point of time. At least, people will spent less time debating at > mailing list and get things done. I guess there is no right or wrong here, it > is just that people have different preference and needs. For instance, I only > do webapp and certainly don't want all the extra complexity/coolness of xwork. > IMHO, xwork if implemented base on idea presented here so far is a very > different beast from existing webwork and might as well start off as a fresh > project. > > Also, if we just concentrate all the efforts on xwork ( which will probably > need sometime to mature ), we are neglecting the immediate need of existing > webwork users. Look at webwork 1.3, it have been at rc1 for sometime and nobody > seems to care about its status. Not to mention it still lack documentation, > real world example application, have outstanding xdoclet bug, etc. > > --- Rickard_�berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Erik Beeson wrote: > > > Rickard, as I understood, XWork was to break away from J2EE, hence > > > removing "web" from the name. If new versions with strong web ties are > > > going to remain, shouldn't they remain under the original WebWork name? > > > > That is something I wanted to gauge by my last couple of emails. I > > personally do not believe (at this point) that making the web part > > "optional" is going to work very well. I certainly don't believe that it > > is going to be feasible, or even a good idea, to make a framework that > > allows code to be written for both Swing and the web. They're different > > beasts with different requirements, with completely different thinking > > behind how code gets written. We have a lot of Swing code in our > > project, and when I look at it I simply don't see how something like > > XWork would fit in, or why it would be useful. > > > > What *is* useful is to allow actions to be called without a servlet > > environment, but more or less *only* for testing/debugging purposes. > > Executing actions as a response to asynchronous messages could work too. > > But that's about it. I do not believe that actions (except for maybe 1% > > of special cases) can be reused in so different spaces. I remain open to > > the *possibility* of it, but so far I just haven't seen it. > > > > So, given all of this, my resignation from XWork still holds. The > > requirements that have been voiced the last few days are not mine, and I > > don't think they're compatible with my goals, at least not without > > serious compromises that will only hurt the end result. The question > > then becomes: would it be useful to do *both* XWork and WebWork, but as > > separate projects with these different goals? > > > > /Rickard > > > > -- > > Rickard �berg > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Senselogic > > > > Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > > http://www.vasoftware.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > --------------------------------------------------------- Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://enigmastation.com IT Consultant ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
