OK, I've commited them. Try it out and let's have some feedback!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Lightbody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "os-ww" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 12:57 AM
Subject: [OS-webwork] Using SiteMesh for the UI tags


> As I've mentioned in the past, I wanted to explore using SiteMesh to power
> the UI taglibs, at least for JSP. I know Rickard threw out the idea of
using
> velocity for all taglibs (regardless if your view is JSP), so what I'd
like
> to see happen is this:
>
> 1) I'll commit my sitemesh integration stuff with a simple TextFieldTag
> implementation that is literally 4 lines of code, since it extends
> ApplyDecoratorTag from SiteMesh while adding a few attribute elements.
>
> 2) Rickard or someone else commit an equally simple veloctiy
> implementation -called from jsp- so that we can compare side-by-side with
> the current success.jsp.
>
> Very rough performance tests showed that when about 50 <ww:textfield/>
tags
> were placed in a row, the page took about 170ms to load on average.
However,
> when I help to ctrl-r and forced about 20 page reloads within about 10ms,
> average response time shot up to about 2000ms.
>
> OK, I'll commit tomorrow morning. In the meantime, Rickard can you hack
> together a velocity-powered taglib?
>
> -Pat
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Opensymphony-webwork mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork

Reply via email to