On the contrary, that makes it perfect for OS! ;) Quoting Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Francois Beauregard wrote: > > A few developers here have used freemarker a little while ago and loved > it. > > It seems to be a very good alternative to velocity. > > > > Since it worked for WebWork and after some little discensions the > community > > seems be very well and alive, I would like to throw the suggestion the > > freemarker joins OpenSymphony. > > > > If the suggestion makes sense, an evaluation of the ptoential must be > done > > by both party. Also, goals and directions for the project should be > > established first. I think this is the part that was missing when the > > WebWork joined OpenSymphony. > > Well, I remember some not so long ago the FreeMarker main developer went > to the Velocity lists and ranted like crazy. It was a very disappointing > read and he just wouldn't give up. I'm sure FreeMarker is ok > technically, but I'd prefer to keep stuff like that out of here. So, no, > I don't think FreeMarker should join OS. > > IMHO. > > /Rickard > > -- > Rickard Öberg > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Senselogic > > Got blog? I do. http://dreambean.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: > SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! > http://www.vasoftware.com > _______________________________________________ > Opensymphony-webwork mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
