> > 4) WikiNaming support (I hate doing [Foo Bar], I like FooBar) > > But certainly not with this one. The Wiki I'm running now (using > SnipSnap) is used by non-techie people, and for them it's certainly > easier to use the [Name goes here] style. Also, I don't see how names > with non-letters would work (e.g. [Oberg, Rickard]) using the WikiNaming > style.
I agree WikiNaming is more restrictive, but I've found that it is that restriction that keeps naming conventions very standard. PatLightbody would always be the WikiLink for my page, but without WikiLinking it could be [Pat Lightbody], [PatLightbody], or [Lightbody, Pat] or any other combo. WikiNaming/Linking tends to force people in to a standard way to layout links and generally produces content that "magically" beings to link itself to other content, unbeknownst to the user. Ie: every word WebWork would be automatically linked to the WebWork page -- the author doesn't need to worry about, "gee, should this be a link". It essentially let's the author focus on content and not navigation. Just my off-topic opinion on the matter. I'm going to write a filter for SnipSnap soon so that this is supported :) -Pat ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp _______________________________________________ Opensymphony-webwork mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensymphony-webwork
